There is a recognizable value in democratic societies in having mechanisms by which the public can come together to discuss the issues of the day, to identify problems, and propose solutions. Historically, the news media – print, radio, and television – has provided the spaces where competing narratives are publicly debated. Today, technology companies are the dominant curators of information and their engineering of a public sphere is significantly different than that of news media enterprises, even news media organizations who are beholden to state or corporate interests.
Can Google render unpopular perspectives invisible? How are relationships between powerful actors, governments, and corporations shaping what “we” see or don’t see online? The cultural, economic, political, and moral pressures that prevent these companies from taking these actions are not inscribed in global law or limited by technology. Around the world, we see a variety of cases where political actors actively manipulate technology for their own gain, through censorship, disinformation, and authoritarian control. Even in the United States, where free speech theoretically reigns, the government is increasingly pressuring technology companies to algorithmically identify terrorists, for example, and provide backdoors for their manipulation.
This project sought to map how the public sphere is currently understood, controlled, and manipulated in order to spark a richer conversation about what interventions should be considered to support the ideal of an informed and engaged citizenry. In addition, this project mapped existing concerns and research already underway in this field and enlisted the advice and aid of a group of scholars who were engaged in this area.
On February 26, 2016, Data & Society held a workshop, Who Controls the Public Sphere in an Era of Algorithms? to drill into the assumptions, values, and tensions at the core of growing concerns about the control and shaping of the public sphere in an era of algorithms. Download workshop notes and more here.
Algorithms and Publics began with a set of case studies that explored how algorithmic media is shaping the public sphere across a variety of dimensions, including the changing role of the journalism industry, the use of algorithms for censorship or international compliance, how algorithms are functioning within foreign policy aims, digital gerrymandering, the spread of misinformation, and more. Download Case Studies here.
Finally, two white papers were published online as part of this project. The first is an historical take on the role media has played within democracy. The second white paper presents issues emerging in the era of algorithms, and highlights existing concerns and tensions about the changing media ecosystem and its effect on democratic and public life.
The Algorithms and Publics project was supported by Open Society Foundations and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
report | 11.14.18
In Content or Context Moderation? by Robyn Caplan illustrates the organizational contexts of three types of content moderation strategies by drawing from interviews with 10 major digital platforms.
paper | 03.18.16
Philip M. Napoli, Robyn Caplan
D&S researcher Robyn Caplan co-wrote a paper analyzing how many large well-known companies, such as Buzzfeed and Facebook, argue against being categorized as media companies. However, Caplan and co-writer...
primer | 05.13.16
Robyn Caplan, danah boyd
Who controls - and who should control - the public sphere in an era of algorithms?
primer | 05.13.16
Laura Reed, danah boyd
In this background primer, D&S Research Analyst Laura Reed and D&S Founder danah boyd situate the current debate around the role of technology in the public sphere within a...
primer | 05.13.16
Laura Reed, Robyn Caplan
A collection of case studies that explores how algorithmic media is shaping the public sphere across a variety of dimensions, including the changing role of the journalism industry, the...
The New York Times
The New York Times
Tim Hwang, Samuel Woolley
Data & Society Researcher Robyn Caplan’s report Content or Context Moderation? referenced in Diplomatic Courier. ” According to Robyn Caplan, AI is currently, for the most part, being used by...
New York Times
D&S research analyst Robyn Caplan was quoted in this NYT piece examining Facebook’s role in the news industry. “This is a funny kind of transparency,” said Robyn Caplan, an...
D&S founder danah boyd was quoted in this piece on Medium that analyzes Facebook’s trending news list. The second, more interesting complaint, as Stanley puts it, isn’t about legal...
D&S will host a workshop on the intersection of technology and media manipulation. To participate, apply by February 15.
Exploring the assumptions, values, and tensions at the core of growing concerns about the shaping of the public sphere...
Social Media, Algorithms, and the Public Interest: Exploring the Migration of a Governance Principle from Traditional to New Media
Phil Napoli discusses social media, algorithms, and the public interest...
Structured Stories and the Computation of Journalistic Context
What can research on the computational journalism project Structured Stories tell us about the trends, tensions, and critical junctures common to digital news production?